University of California San Francisco | About UCSF | UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
Search Site | Find a Doctor
Print this page
FONT SIZE
Home > Doctors > Edward Sickles

Edward Sickles, M.D.

Radiologist

Clinics

Radiology at Women's Health Center
2356 Sutter St., Room J-146 and J-226
San Francisco, CA 94115
Scheduling: (415) 353-2573
Fax: (415) 353-7140

Hours: Monday to Friday
7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.

More about Edward Sickles

Education

Cornell University 1969

Residencies

UCSF, Diagnostic Radiology 1976

Fellowships

Cornell/NIH, Internal Medicine 1973

Selected Research and Publications

  1. Harvey JA, Yaffe MJ, D'Orsi C, Sickles EA. Density and breast cancer risk. Radiology. 2013 May; 267(2):657-8.
  2. Graf O, Berg WA, Sickles EA. Large rodlike calcifications at mammography: analysis of morphologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb; 200(2):299-303.
  3. Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA, Arasu VA, Joe BN, Lvoff NM, Leung JW, Brenner RJ, Flowers CI, Moore DH, Sickles EA. Mammographic surveillance after breast conservation therapy. Radiology. 2013 Feb; 266(2):685.
  4. Arasu VA, Joe BN, Lvoff NM, Leung JW, Brenner RJ, Flowers CI, Moore DH, Sickles EA. Response. Radiology. 2013 Feb; 266(2):685-6.
  5. Monticciolo DL, Rebner M, Appleton CM, Newell MS, Farria DM, Sickles EA, Umphrey HR, Butler PF. The ACR/Society of Breast Imaging Resident and Fellowship Training Curriculum for Breast Imaging, Updated. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Mar; 10(3):207-210.e4.
  6. D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, Sechopoulos I, Newell MS, Gundry KR, Bates SR, Nishikawa RM, Sickles EA, Karellas A, D'Orsi EM. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):81-8.
  7. Onega T, Smith M, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Rosenberg RD, Smith RA, Sickles EA, Haneuse S, Anderson ML, Yankaskas B. Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Nov; 9(11):788-94.
  8. D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA. To seek perfection or not? That is the question. Radiology. 2012 Oct; 265(1):9-11.
  9. Carney PA, Abraham L, Cook A, Feig SA, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG. Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Sep; 19(9):1114-20.
  10. Arasu VA, Joe BN, Lvoff NM, Leung JW, Brenner RJ, Flowers CI, Moore DH, Sickles EA. Benefit of semiannual ipsilateral mammographic surveillance following breast conservation therapy. Radiology. 2012 Aug; 264(2):371-7.
  11. Gruber R, Jaromi S, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Riedl CC, Flöry D, Graf O, Sickles EA, Helbich TH. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Eur J Radiol. 2013 Mar; 82(3):398-403.
  12. Schur EA, Elmore JE, Onega T, Wernli KJ, Sickles EA, Haneuse S. The impact of obesity on follow-up after an abnormal screening mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Feb; 21(2):327-36.
  13. Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Smith RA, Sickles EA. Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice. Radiology. 2012 Jan; 262(1):69-79.
  14. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, Taplin SH, Sickles EA. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18; 155(8):493-502.
  15. Doyle GP, Onysko J, Pogany L, Major D, Caines J, Shumak R, Wadden N, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Miglioretti DL. Limitations of minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology. 2011 Mar; 258(3):960-1.
  16. Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BM, Muss HB, Irwig L. Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 2011 Feb 23; 305(8):790-9.
  17. Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology. 2011 Apr; 259(1):72-84.
  18. Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Sickles EA, Geller BM, Feig SA, Jackson S, Brown D, Cook A, Yankaskas BC, Miglioretti DL, Elmore JG. Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall. Acad Radiol. 2011 Apr; 18(4):495-503.
  19. Carney PA, Geller BM, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Aiello Bowles EJ, Abraham L, Feig SA, Brown D, Cook AJ, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG. Feasibility and satisfaction with a tailored web-based audit intervention for recalibrating radiologists' thresholds for conducting additional work-up. Acad Radiol. 2011 Mar; 18(3):369-76.
  20. Onega T, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Elmore JG. Radiologists' perceptions of computer aided detection versus double reading for mammography interpretation. Acad Radiol. 2010 Oct; 17(10):1217-26.

Publications are derived from MEDLINE/PubMed and provided by UCSF Profiles, a service of the Clinical & Translational Science Institute (CTSI) at UCSF. Researchers can make corrections and additions by logging on to UCSF Profiles.

Home • Terms of Use • Site Map • Contact Us       © 2002 - 2013 The Regents of The University of California